International Science Index


10007353

A Multi-Level Approach to Improve Sustainability Performances of Industrial Agglomerations

Abstract:

Documented experiences of industrial symbiosis are always triggered and driven only by economic goals: environmental and (even rarely) social results are sometimes assessed and declared as effects of virtuous behaviours, but are merely casual and un-pursued side externalities. Even worse: all the symbiotic project candidates entailing economic loss for just one of the (also dozen) partners are simply stopped without considering the overall benefit for the whole partnership. The here-presented approach aims at providing methodologies and tools to effectively manage these situations and fostering the implementation of virtuous symbiotic investments in manufacturing aggregations for a more sustainable production.

References:
[1] Chertow, M.R. 2000. “Industrial Symbiosis: literature and taxonomy”, Annual reviews in energy and the environment 25(1): 313-317
[2] Salonen, T. 2010. “Strategies, Structures, and Processes for Network and Resources Management in Industrial Parks – The case of Germany and China.”
[3] Esty, D.C., Porter, M.E. 1998. “Industrial ecology and competitiveness: strategic implications for the Firm”, Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(1): 35-43
[4] Frosch, R., Gallopoulos, N. 1989. “Strategies for manufacturing”, Scientific American 3(3): 144-152
[5] Mirata, M. 2004. “Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges”, Journal of Cleaner production, (12): pp. 967-983
[6] Ashton, W. 2008. “Understanding the organization of industrial ecosystems”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(1): 34-51
[7] Howard-Grenville, J.A., Paquin, R. 2009. “Organizational dynamics in industrial ecosystems: insights from organizational theory”, in M. Ruth and B. Davidsdottir (Eds), Changing Stocks, Flows and Behaviours of Industrial Ecosystems, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA, pp. 122-139
[8] Roberts, B.H. 2004. The application of industrial ecology principles and planning guidelines for the development of eco-industrial parks: an Australian case study”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (12): 997-1010
[9] Jacobsen, N.B. 2006. “Industrial symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: a quantitative assessment of economic and environmental aspects”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(1-2): 239-255
[10] Korhonen, J. 2002. “Two paths to industrial ecology: applying the product-based and geographical approaches”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45(1): 39-57
[11] Lombardi, D.R., Laybourn, P. 2012. “Redefining industrial symbiosis: crossing academic-practitioner boundaries”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(1): 28-37
[12] Chertow, M.R., Ashton, W.S., Espinosa J.C. 2008. “Industrial symbiosis in Puerto Rico: Environmentally-related economies”, Regional Studies, 42(10): 1299-1312
[13] Massard, G., Jacquet, O., Zürcher, D. 2014. International survey on eco-innovation parks. Learning from experiences on the spatial dimension of eco-innovation.”, Federal Office for the Environmental and the ERA-NET ECO-INNOVERA, Bern
[14] WECD. 1987. “Our Common Future”, Oxford University Press, Oxford
[15] Deloitte. 2013. “White paper on Swiss Manufacturing Industry: Challenges and prospects in global competition”
[16] Elkington, J. 1998. “Cannibals with Forks: the triple bottom line of 21st Century Business”, New society publishers, Canada
[17] ISO14040:2006 - Environmental management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and framework. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html - Accessed on 23/07/2017
[18] ISO14044:2006 - Environmental management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and guidelines. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html - Accessed on 23/07/2017
[19] Hunkeler, D., Lichtenvort, K., Rebitzer, G., Ciroth, A., Huppes, G., Klöpffer, I., Rüdenauer, B., Swarr, T. and Steen. 2008. “Enviornmental life cycle costing”. SETAC
[20] Andrews, E., Barthel, L., Beck, T., Benoit, C., Ciroth, A., Cucuzzella, C., Gensch, C., Hérbert, J., Lesage, P., Manhart, A., Mazeau, P. 2009. “Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products.” UNEP/SETAC
[21] Weidema, B. 2006. The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment,” International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 11(2): 88-97
[22] Klöpffer, W., 2008. “Life cycle sustainability assessment of products”. International journal of life cycle assessment. 13(2): 89-95
[23] Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E., Lehmann, A., Traverso, M. 2010. “Towards life cycle sustainability assessment”. Sustainability. 2(10): 3309-3322
[24] Ciroth, A., Finkbeiner, M., Hildebrand, J., Klöpffer, W., Mazjin, B., Prakash, S., Sonnemann, G., Traverso, M., Ugaya, C., Valdivia, S., Vickery-Niederman, G. 2011. “Towards life cycle sustainability assessment”. UNEP/SETAC
[25] Traverso, M. Finkbeiner, M., Jorgensen, A., Schneider, L. 2012. “Life cycle sustainability dashboard”. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 16(5): 680-688
[26] http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org - Accessed on 23/07/2017
[27] Valdivia, S., Ugaya, L., Hildebrand, J., Traverso, M., Mazjin, B., Sonnemann, G. 2012. “A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20”. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 18(9): 1673-1685
[28] Atilgan, B., Azapagic, A. 2016. “An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Turkey”. Energy Policy. 93: 168-186
[29] Bent, D. 2006. “Towards a monetised triple bottom line for an alcohol producer”. Sustainability accounting and reporting. 61-82
[30] Nguyen, T., Laratte, B., Guillaume, B., Hua, A. 2016. “Quantifying environmental externalities with a view to internalizing them in the price of products, using different monetization models”. Resource, Conservation and Recycling. 109: 13-23
[31] Weidema, P.B. 2009. “Using the budget constraint to monetarise impact assessment results”. Ecological economics. 68(6): 1591-1598
[32] Van der Velden, M.N., Vogtlander, J.G. 2017. “Monetisation of external socio-economic costs of industrial production: A social-LCA-based case of clothing production”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 153: 320-330
[33] Paquin, R.L., Howard-Grenville, J. 2012. “The evolution of facilitated industrial symbiosis. Journal of industrial ecology. 16(1): 83-93
[34] Valentine, S.V. 2016. “Kalundborg symbiosis: fostering progressive innovation in environmental networks”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 118: 65-77
[35] Van Beers, D., Corder, G., Bossilkow, A., van Berkel, R. 2007. “Industrial symbiosis in the Australian minerals industry: the cases of Kwinana and Gladstone”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(1): 55-72
[36] Shi, H., Chertow, M., Song, Y. 2010. “Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(3): 191-199
[37] Sokka, L., Lehtoranta, S., Nissinen, A., Melanen, M. 2010. “Analyzing the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis: life cycle assessment applied to a Finnish forest industry context”. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 15(1) 137-155
[38] Daddi, T., Nucci, B., Iraldo, F. 2017. “Using life cycle assessment (LCA) to measure the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis in an industrial cluster of SMEs”. Journal of Cleaner Production. 147: 157-164
[39] Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M. 2006. “Managing the Business Case of Sustainability”.