International Science Index


The Fiscal and Macroeconomic Impacts of Reforming Energy Subsidy Policy in Malaysia

Abstract:The rationalization of a gradual subsidies reforms plan has been set out by the Malaysian government to achieve the high-income nation target. This paper attempts to analyze the impacts of energy subsidy reform policy on fiscal deficit and macroeconomics variables in Malaysia. The Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model is employed. Three simulations based on different groups of scenarios have been developed. Importantly, the overall results indicate that removal of fuel subsidy has significantly improved the real GDP and reduced the government fiscal deficit. On the other hand, the removal of the fuel subsidy has increased most of the local commodity prices, especially energy commodities. The findings of the study could provide some imperative inputs for policy makers, especially to identify the right policy mechanism. This is especially ensures the subsidy savings from subsidy removal could be transferred back into the domestic economy in the form of infrastructure development, compensation and increases in others sector output contributions towards a sustainable economic growth.
[1] Economic Planning Unit (EPU), “Tenth Malaysia Plan,” 2011-2015. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer, 2010.
[2] M. Ramasamy & C.P. Koon, “Malaysiaraises fuel prices as Najib seeks to trim budget gap,” Retrieved from, September 2, 2013.
[3] Ministry of Finance, Annual Reports, Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia Printing Office, 2010.
[4] N.Y. Mohamed Yusoff & H.A Bekhet “The effect of energy subsidy removal on energy demand and potential energy savings in Malaysia,” Procedia Economics and Finance, pp. 189-197, 2016.
[5] C.K. Cheok, “Missing the Point: Malaysia’s Debate on Fuel Price Subsidies,” EKONOMIKA, Bulletin Persatuan Ekonomi Malaysia, vol.1 (1): pp.1-4, 2009.
[6] O.H. Alshehab, “Fuel subsidies and unemployment: A CGE model applied to Iran,” USAEE Working Paper, pp.11-74, 2011.
[7] C. Riedy & M. Diesendorf, “Financial subsidies to the Australian fossil fuel industry,” Energy Policy, vol.31 (2), pp.125-137, 2003.
[8] D. A. Nurdianto & Resosudarmo, “B. P. Prospects and challenges for an ASEAN energy integration policy,” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, vol. 13(2), pp.103-127, 2011.
[9] S. Solaymani & F. Kari, “Impacts of energy subsidy reform on the Malaysian economy and transportation sector. Energy Policy, vol.70, 115–125. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.035,2014.
[10] A.Q. Al-Amin, A.H Jaafar and C. Siwar, “A Computable General Equilibrium Approach in Trade And Environmental Modelling in the Malaysian Economy," MPRA Paper 8772,2008.
[11] B. Lin & Z. Jiang, “Estimates of Energy Subsidies in China and Impact of Energy Subsidies Reform. Energy Economics, vol.33, pp. 273-283, 2011.
[12] M.H. Toh & Q. Lin, “An Evaluation of the Tax Reform in China Using a General Equilibrium Mode,” China Economic Review, vol. 16(3), pp. 246-270, 2005.
[13] W. Liu & H. Li, “Improving energy consumption structure: A comprehensive assessment of fossil energy subsidies reform in China”, Energy Policy, vol. 39, pp. 4134-4143, 2011.
[14] S. Abouleinein, N Kamal., M Ibrahim, A Mahmoud and H Dabbour, “Impacts of changing prices of energy on prices of goods and services,” Unpublished Study for the Organization of Energy Planning, Egypt. Available online at, 2009.
[15] International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC), retrieved from, 2005.
[16] Department of Statistics, Malaysia, (2010), Malaysia Input-Output Table 2005.
[17] H. Lofgren, R. L. Harris & S. Robinson,” A standard computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS”, IFPRI Working Paper , vo.5, IFPRI Publication, retrieved from,2002.
[18] Department of Statistics, Malaysia, “Malaysia Input-Output Table 2005”, 2010.